|
AUDITIONING
AND INTERVIEWING
FOR
DANCE AND DRAMA COURSES
CODE OF PRACTICE
and
GUIDANCE ON DEVISING
AN APPEALS PROCEDURE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scope
of the Code |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
The
Precepts |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A school
undertakes to consider all applications |
|
|
2 |
A school undertakes
to provide candidates with the necessary information before and at the selection
process |
|
3 |
A school undertakes
to provide information on the availability of and criteria for allocation
of public funding |
|
4 |
A school undertakes
to give candidates the opportunity to demonstrate their potential to fulfil
the aims of the course |
|
5 |
A
school undertakes to ensure that the decision-making process is fair and
transparent |
|
6 |
A school undertakes to ensure that
candidates are informed of the outcomes of an audition/interview |
|
|
|
|
Guidance on devising an appeals procedure
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Appendix: Examples of good practice
observed in dance and drama schools
|
|
|
For information
contact:
Council for Dance Education and Training (CDET)
Toynbee Hall,
28 Commercial Street,
London E1 6LS
t 020 7247 4030
f 020 7247 3404
[email protected]
www.cdet.org.uk
|
National Council for Drama Training (NCDT)
Mary Ward House
5 Tavistock Place,
London WC1H 9SS
t 020 7387 3650
f 020 7681 4733
[email protected]
www.ncdt.co.uk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCOPE OF THE CODE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
This Code of Practice governs the conduct of auditions
and interviews (‘the Code’). It is designed to provide a
framework within which vocational schools offering training in dance
and drama, audition and interview potential students. The Code was commissioned
by the Department for Education and Skills (DfES) as part of the Dance
and Drama Awards (‘the Awards’) and the Precepts are compulsory
for all schools offering Awards. Schools offering Awards should be able
to demonstrate that they follow the six precepts outlined in this Code
in establishing their own audition and interview procedures. The Guidance
on Devising an Appeals Procedure (‘the Guidance’) has been
drafted because Dance and Drama Awards schools must have in place a
procedure enabling students to appeal against decisions made about the
allocation of Awards.
The intention in drafting
a Code and Guidance was to assist schools in ensuring that their policies
and procedures for interviewing and auditioning students are transparent,
robust and fair. A formal mechanism for appeals protects the school
as well as allowing students a formal method of challenging the allocation
process.
Neither the Code nor the Guidance is intended to be prescriptive
in its detail. The DfES sees the Code as a foundation for auditioning
and interviewing, it recognises that most schools’ practice is
over and above the requirements of the Code. Schools should implement
policies and procedures in line with the precepts. Specific examples
of good practice are provided in an appendix and are designed to illustrate
the Code. On that basis it is hoped that the Code and the Guidance will
be applicable across the dance and drama sectors and not limited to
schools participating in the Awards.
Prepared by the Council for Dance Education and Training
(CDET) and the National Council for Drama Training (NCDT), with assistance
from the Conference of Drama Schools (CDS).
July 2002
|
1 |
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION
|
|
|
The Code of Practice governing the conduct of auditions and
interviews
The Code covers six elements of an application procedure, referred
to as its ‘precepts’. These precepts are the key principles
underpinning a fair and transparent procedure. They were arrived at
through a review of how auditions were conducted by a variety of schools
auditioning candidates for courses in dance, acting, dance teaching,
musical theatre, stage management and technical theatre.
The Code forms the basis for the fair and consistent treatment of candidates.
Potential students are considered to be ‘candidates’ from
the point at which they make an application to the school. The precepts
cover the process of considering applications, selecting candidates
for interview or audition, the conduct of the audition and interview,
the decision-making process and how this is communicated to the candidate.
Each precept is underpinned by an explanation and benchmarks for judging
good practice. Further examples of good practice in action have been
drawn from the observation of auditions and interviews in a number of
vocational dance and drama schools. These are included in an appendix
at the end of the Code.
The Code is intended as a guide to help schools draft their own procedures
and policies in line with an agreed industry standard. Schools may,
of course, wish to exceed the basic requirements set out in the Code
in their own standards of practice. The DfES recognises that this is
the case with most schools. The Code has taken account of the relevant
equal opportunities legislation and has been drafted to meet the requirements
of the Human Rights Act 1998 which incorporated the European Convention
on Human Rights into English law.
Guidance on devising an appeals procedure
The Guidance offers advice on how a school should devise a fair and
transparent procedure for reviewing decisions made at audition and interview.
As noted above, publicly funded institutions are required to have an
appeals procedure in place. Other schools are, however, strongly advised
to put in place an appeals mechanism. The Guidance advises on the grounds,
method and suggested outcome of any appeal, with notes on approaches
to drafting a procedure.
Access to vocational training
Creating access to potential candidates who might not otherwise pursue
vocational dance or drama training is outside the remit of this Code.
Nevertheless, ensuring that students are drawn from a wide spectrum
of backgrounds is a concern of public funding agencies. As well as operating
a fair and robust audition and interview process, schools are urged
to review their policies on advertising courses and providing opportunities
for talented students to enter into vocational training. Examples of
good practice found during the research of the Code included:
|
2 |
|
|
|
•
•
• |
targeting candidates from under-represented groups (for example, encouraging
male students to consider a dance training);
providing open days and other opportunities to visit the school;
and
reviewing the representation of the school and its students in all published
materials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CODE
OF PRACTICE GOVERNING THE CONDUCT
OF AUDITIONS AND INTERVIEWS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRECEPT
ONE: A school undertakes to consider all applications |
|
|
All applications will be considered within a published timescale, against
the same criteria. Not all applications will necessarily result in audition/interview.
Equal opportunities will be practiced in the consideration of every
application.
A school should:
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
•
•
•
•
|
Have clear written criteria for the initial assessment of students
Ensure that initial selection criteria are used for all candidates
Make provision for candidates with different access requirements at
the application stage
Ask students to disclose information that may have a bearing on their
application or
audition / interview.
|
|
|
|
|
PRECEPT
TWO: A school undertakes to provide candidates with the necessary information
before and at the selection process |
|
|
Candidates will be told in advance about the method of selection, eg audition,
interview or a combination. Candidates will also be told how, where and
when the audition and/or interview will take place.
n.b. In cases of applications from candidates under 18 years, information
about the audition should also be sent to the parent / guardian.
The candidate should be provided with:
|
|
|
|
|
Good notice of audition and/or interview dates
Information about the location of the school and on physical access
to the building
Details of the school’s criteria for assessing applicants
The timetable for the audition/interview including, where applicable,
stages at which candidates may not be invited to continue
The school’s policy on the composition of audition/interview panels.
|
|
|
•
•
•
•
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRECEPT
THREE: A school undertakes to provide information on the availability of
and criteria for the allocation of public funding |
|
|
Candidates will be given information about public funding dispensed
by the school including how many Dance and Drama Awards the school has
to offer at the time, where possible. The school will have devised a
standard procedure for allocating Awards, in line with its criteria
for selection at audition and interview.
A school should provide:
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
•
• •
•
•
|
Relevant information on public funding, including
Dance and Drama Awards;
A published deadline for applications should they wish to be considered
for an Award or other funded place;
Criteria used by the school to allocate funding in line with government
requirements;
Information about how Awards criteria will be applied to applicants;
An indication, where possible, of what ratio of the intake is likely
to receive an Award or
other funded place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRECEPT
FOUR: A school undertakes to give candidates the opportunity to demonstrate
their potential to fulfil the aims of the course |
|
|
|
|
|
Candidates selected for audition / interview will be given the opportunity
to show their potential in relation to core elements of the course.
Not all candidates will necessarily be invited to participate in the
entire audition / interview process.
A school should:
|
|
|
•
• • • •
• |
Endeavour to create an appropriate and positive atmosphere
Give candidates the opportunity and space to warm up appropriately
Ensure that the audition/interview is relevant to the course
Make provision for applicants with disabilities (ie visual impairment,
dyslexia, illiteracy, mobility difficulties)
Give candidates sufficient opportunity to rest or change between different
elements of the audition / interview process
Refer to the importance of suitability for the training and specific
demands of the course.
|
|
|
|
|
PRECEPT
FIVE: A school undertakes to ensure that the decision making process is
fair and transparent |
|
|
The school will have clear criteria for making judgments and these
will be used in reaching decisions on each candidate. The application
process will be in keeping with the school’s equal opportunities
policy. Those responsible for auditioning / interviewing will have comprehensive
understanding of the criteria for assessment and refer to this in their
observation and assessment of each candidate.
A school should:
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
•
•
•
•
• •
•
• |
Have devised clear, written criteria for the assessment of students,
both for a place on the course and for the allocation of an Award.
Ensure that all criteria for assessment are in keeping with the aims
and objectives of the course, which should in turn be relevant to industry
requirements.
Ensure that objective assessment criteria are used.
Ensure that those responsible for auditioning / interviewing have the
appropriate skills and expertise and are trained in audition/interview
techniques.
Ensure, where possible, that the panel includes both male and female
members and represents the diversity of the training at the school.
Ensure that those responsible for auditioning / interviewing, know the
aims of the course and are able to assess potential in relation to those
aims.
Ensure that those responsible for auditioning / interviewing use assessment
forms alongside the
criteria and keep clear, accurate and appropriate records of their findings.
Promote an inclusive decision making process. The auditioning / interviewing
panel should
discuss their observations and all should have an input into making
decisions.
|
|
|
|
PRECEPT
SIX: A school undertakes to ensure that candidates are informed of the outcome
of an audition / interview |
|
Candidates will be told how and when they will know if they are to
be offered a place on a course, and / or whether they have been offered
an Award. Successful candidates will be told of the obligations placed
on a potential student, including how and when they must accept or
decline the offer of a place and / or Award.
A school should:
|
|
•
• • • |
Inform candidates of audition/interview outcomes in writing as soon
as is practicable.
Have a policy on the provision of feedback and make this known to candidates.
If feedback is provided, ensure that it is given sensitively, fairly
and in relation to the
criteria for assessment.
Allow access to records on request. (In accordance with the Data Protection
Act 1998, schools are permitted to charge a fee for this.)
|
|
|
|
DEVISING AN APPEALS PROCEDURE
|
|
Notes for schools wishing to devise and implement an appeals procedure.
It is a DfES requirement that all schools offering Dance and Drama
Awards have an appeals procedure.
Introduction
The information given below provides a framework for good practice
and is intended as guidance for those who wish to ensure that their
procedures conform to quality standards provided in the sector.
Although this material specifically refers to the appropriate procedures
to be used in the event of appeals against not being allocated an Award,
many of the same principles apply to similar situations that could arise
as a result of the auditioning process.
In both of these circumstances schools should ensure that all appeals
guidance material is:
|
6 |
|
|
|
•
• • |
Clear.
Easily available in a form intended to reach all interested parties.
Issued to promote equality of treatment for all applicants.
|
|
|
|
Information to be included in the written appeals procedure
and guidance.
Circumstances and procedures in schools will vary, but appeals guidance
should be written and should include the following information:
|
|
1
2
3 |
Right of appeal
Unsuccessful candidates should be advised that they have the right of
appeal. They should be informed of the appeals procedure on request.
Acceptable grounds for appeal
It should be made clear to unsuccessful candidates that appeals will
only be considered where it is claimed that there were irregularities
in the audition / interview procedure.
The recommended method of appeal
An appeals procedure should give details as to who can legitimately
make an appeal, to whom the appeal should be addressed and how the appeal
should be handled.
|
|
|
As a guide, the procedure should state that:
|
|
•
•
•
•
•
• |
The appeal should be made in writing by the person who signed the original
entry form (in the
case of candidates under eighteen, an appeal should be made by a parent
/ guardian.
The appeal should be addressed to the relevant authority (such as the
Principal, Director of
Studies or Registrar)
The grounds for appeal should be clearly stated and supported by supplementary
evidence.
Appeals should be post marked at a specified date (e.g. within 14 days)
following the initial
notification of failure to obtain an Award or access to written appeals
procedure.
The receipt of all appeals will be acknowledged within a specified period
(e.g. within 7 days).
On receipt, the appeal will be passed to the person responsible (this
varies between schools).
|
|
|
|
|
4 The appeals procedure
used
Details of how the appeal will be conducted should be given to the candidate
or parent / guardian. As practice within each school will vary, basic
information should be provided concerning the process used, to include
the following:
|
7 |
|
|
|
•
• • |
Who is responsible for administering the appeals procedure;
How the appeal is processed;
The likely outcomes of an appeal.
|
|
The person bringing the appeal should be advised to contact one person
responsible for the administration of the appeals procedure. In some
schools this is the Admissions Officer or Registrar.
On receipt of the appeal the school should undertake a review of the
auditions process to satisfy itself that legitimate grounds for an appeal
have been established. In order to help ensure objectivity, measures
should be taken to involve a senior member of staff or external representative
who was not involved in the original awarding/auditioning process.
The school should satisfy itself that:
|
|
• •
• |
The procedures used conform to the precepts of the Code specified for
auditions and no irregularities have occurred.
That in the case of the awarding process, the procedures used conform
with the specifications of the funding body.
In the allocation of Awards / places all candidates were treated equally.
|
|
As the decision making process can be quite complex, schools should
be prepared to provide evidence of fair practice in the implementation
of their procedures. Schools should take note of the fact that in the
event of a successful appeal, if the original audition did not conform
to the Code, then a repeat audition would have to be held.
|
|
5 The likely outcomes of the appeal
Unsuccessful candidates should be informed that there are two outcomes
of an appeal:
EITHER the appeal is upheld and the candidate is re-assessed at a fresh
audition;
OR the appeal is denied.
6 The method of providing feedback
The unsuccessful candidate should receive written confirmation of the
result of their appeal within 7 days of an outcome being established.
7 Respect for confidentiality
The school will wish to keep a record of the details of the appeal,
including the circumstances, nature of the complaint and the decision
making process. This information should be kept in a secure place, as
part of the school’s data protection procedures.
|
|
|
|
APPENDIX
Examples of good practice observed in dance and drama
schools
|
|
Examples
supporting Precept One
A school undertakes to consider all applications |
|
|
Staff from the school visit youth groups in inner cities to talk about
vocational training. Young people from under-represented groups are
also targeted through specific advertising campaigns.?
Prospectus and application forms are available in large print for
those with visual impairments?
Dance youth groups, run by the school, offer the opportunity for audition
preparation.
If unsuccessful at audition, candidates are given feedback on how
they could improve or are invited to an Easter or summer school where
they have a chance to develop their skills and experience before they
audition again.
A ‘road show’ tours Britain throughout the year offering
classes and workshops by teachers on the faculty. Promising students
are encouraged to attend an audition later in the year.
|
|
8 |
|
•
•
•
•
• |
|
|
|
|
|
Examples
supporting Precept Two
A school undertakes to provide candidates with the necessary information
before and at the selection process |
|
|
|
• |
The Principal welcomes candidates and explains the focus of the course,
outlining the need for candidates to have a good understanding of the
particular training on offer. The Principal gives examples of other
types of training and candidates are reminded that they should be clear
about what they want from the course.
Candidates are shown a video at the beginning of the day that covers
all aspects of the training, the school and the employment gained by
graduating students. The video highlights the quality of the training
and includes interviews with casting agents and choreographers. It emphasises
the level of commitment and personal qualities expected from the students.
The video is followed by a question and answer session with senior members
of staff. Parents and guardians have the opportunity to ask any further
questions while the candidates prepare for class.
All applicants are provided with an information pack with comprehensive
guidance listing fundamental and desired physical and qualitative requirements
for course entry. The pack also includes timetables for auditions, guidance
on how to prepare, funding and other information. Candidates who make
it to the recall stage are invited to one of the school’s open
days, where
they can observe, take part in classes and ask questions
|
|
•
|
|
• |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Examples
supporting Precept Three
A school undertakes to provide information on the availability of and criteria
for the allocation of public funding |
|
|
|
|
• |
Comprehensive written guidance is given on funding, listing contacts
for LEA, trusts and foundations and other bodies which can offer further
advice on funding. The school directs candidates to CDET / NCDT and
CDS for information.
(www.cdet.org.uk
or www.ncdt.co.uk
and www.drama.ac.uk)
Candidates are told about the public funding available for training
and how the school allocates its Awards. Candidates are told about the
criteria against which they will be assessed. A school advisor, with
knowledge of funding from private and public sources, is available to
talk to candidates.
It is stated in the prospectus that candidates wishing to be considered
for an Award must apply before the end of June. The criteria for selection
are stated and candidates are informed that senior staff will make final
decisions regarding entry and scholarship places. The school aims to
notify students within three days.
Award auditions are held at stages throughout the audition process.
All candidates have already gone through a first stage audition and
academic screening process. External judges contribute to the decision-making
process. Judges are asked to rank candidates in three categories: Awarded,
Reserve and Not Awarded.
|
9 |
|
|
|
• |
|
• |
|
• |
|
|
|
Examples
supporting Precept Four
A school undertakes to give candidates the opportunity to demonstrate their
potential to fulfil the aims of the course. |
|
|
|
•
|
Classical ballet classes are followed by movement and improvisation
sessions to assess the candidates’ freedom of movement and imagination.
Additional time is allowed to see candidates again if required. The
audition includes a warm-up barre that is not observed or assessed by
the panel to allow candidates to relax and warm up thoroughly.
Dyslexia is addressed in sight-reading in consultation with the British
Dyslexia Association (www.bda-dyslexia.org.uk).
Candidates with dyslexia are asked to read a specifically created text
text, developed in consultation with the BDA.
Candidates sing a song together and warm-up as a group. Trust games
are played. The combination of vocal and physical warm-up, speeches,
sight-reading and movement workshops gives participants an opportunity
to demonstrate their potential for learning. A screen test interview
gives an opportunity for candidates to talk about themselves. The movement
workshop gives them the opportunity to improvise, use their imagination
and show commitment and focus.?
Each candidate is given 15 minutes with the panel to perform their
speeches. Direction is given during this time to explore understanding
of the text and character; ability to connect with the text and response
to directive input. Qualitative input is given in classes to give candidates
the opportunity to demonstrate an ability to process information.
|
|
• |
|
• |
|
• |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Examples
supporting Precept Five
A school undertakes to ensure that the decision-making process is fair and
transparent. |
|
|
|
|
• |
The criteria for assessment, available to candidates both in the school’s
prospectus and on request, are clearly referred to in directions given
for speeches.
Each panel member has a comprehensive form listing criteria for assessment,
which include specific technical ability as well as creative achievements.
The form enables panel members to make notes as well as give grades
for each criterion.
A short section of contemporary dance is observed. Consideration is
given to the fact that candidates may have limited experience, as the
school’s main focus is ballet. This enables the panel to observe
the candidates’ potential to develop in this discipline.
The panel, comprising heads of each department, observe the entire
audition as a group. They meet at stages throughout the day to discuss
their observations. If there are any discrepancies in opinion amongst
the panel, the candidates in question are auditioned further and extra
time is allocated for this purpose.
|
10 |
|
• |
|
|
|
• |
|
• |
|
|
|
Examples
supporting Precept Six
A school undertakes to ensure that candidates are informed of the outcome
of an audition / interview. |
|
|
|
•
|
Unsuccessful candidates may call the school and discuss why they were
not considered right for the training. Feedback is based on observations
and assessments recorded on report forms in relation to given criteria.
At stages throughout the day, candidates are invited individually to
meet the panel and be informed of the outcome of their audition by the
Course Director. He gives feedback with clear reference to the criteria
for assessment and advice on how they may develop their experience/skills.
Those declined places are given clear reasons. Candidates on the reserve
list are informed as to why the panel has reservations about offering
them an unconditional place and are advised on what they can develop.
All candidates are made to feel at ease and are invited to ask questions.
|
|
|
• |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--back
to top-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|